E. Tris Napier Co. v. Daniels

92 S.E. 650, 147 Ga. 9, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 12
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 650 (E. Tris Napier Co. v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E. Tris Napier Co. v. Daniels, 92 S.E. 650, 147 Ga. 9, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 12 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Where three persons execute a deed of conveyance to land, and subsequently the Successor in title of the grantee brings ejectment against two of the grantors, the defendants will not be heard to allege or prove that the other grantor was not of age when the deed was executed, or that they were not the sole owners of the land conveyed, as against express recitals to this effect contained in the deed.

2. Applying the foregoing principle of law to the present case, it was error [10]*10to receive testimony contradicting the recitals of the deed referred to, and error to grant a nonsuit.

May 16, 1917. . Ejectment. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. May 31, 1916. Plunlceit & Williams, for plaintiff. Samuel B. Hunter and H. F. Slrohecker, for defendants.

Judgment reversed,.

All the Justices concur; except Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Wood
7 S.E.2d 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 650, 147 Ga. 9, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-tris-napier-co-v-daniels-ga-1917.