E. T., V. & G. R. R. v. Connor

1 Ga. L. Rep. 26
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 26 (E. T., V. & G. R. R. v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E. T., V. & G. R. R. v. Connor, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 26 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Per Cooke, J.,

affirming.

1. Railways — Alighting from Moving Train. For a passenger to leave ■the train while it is in motion, was formerly held negligence perse, which would bar any action for injuries received in so alighting. But, now in Tennessee, the inquiry is, as in other cases, whose negligence was first and most gross. Held, accordingly : That a woman who stepped from the train while it was moving, only as fast as a man would walk, in obedience to the directions of the conductor, and was injured because of the darkness of the night, and the roughness of the ground; was entitled to recover damages. Citing Chicago, etc. R. R. Company vs. Cartwright. 52 Mich. 606 S. C., 50 Am. Rep. 274, Rover, Railways 1,117, 1,092. Thompson, Carriers of Passengers, 227.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cartwright v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.
18 N.W. 380 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-t-v-g-r-r-v-connor-ga-1885.