E. Regensberg & Sons v. American Exch. Cigar Co.

130 F. 549, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HOLT, District Judge.

If the points raised by this demurrer had never been passed upon before, I should consider it a serious question whether the patent was not void for lack of invention. Conley v. Marum (C. C.) 83 Fed. 309. But, as the precise questions have been decided on demurrer by Judge Wallace in suits brought by these complainants against other cigar companies, I think that his decision should be followed in this case.

Demurrer overruled, with leave to defendant to answer within 20 days on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. Regensberg & Sons v. American Exch. Cigar Co., 130 F. 549, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826 (circtsdny 1904).

130 F. 549 (E. Regensberg & Sons v. American Exch. Cigar Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benjamin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Dale Co.
158 F. 617 (Second Circuit, 1907)