E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Electric Co.

25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 863 (E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Electric Co., 25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for reargument of appeal “upon a full printed record,” etc., and for other relief. Upon the original submission of the appeal, this court affirmed the judgment insofar as appealed from, on the ground that the filed appendix was inadequate to permit a determination of the questions involved (21 A D 2d 306). The Court of Appeals reversed and remitted the appeal to this court, with a direction designed to give appellant ■’! opportunity to file a further appendix (17 N Y 2d 51). Motion granted to the following extent: Appeal set down for argument at the September Term, beginning September 7, 1966. The County Clerk, Nassau County, is directed to make available to appellant’s attorney, for the purpose of reproduction, the filed copy of the stenographic trial transcript. Appellant shall serve and file the record on appeal on or before July 8, 1966.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for reargument of appeal “upon a full printed record,” etc., and for other relief. Upon the original submission of the appeal, this court affirmed the judgment insofar as appealed from, on the ground that the filed appendix was inadequate to permit a determination of the questions involved (21 A D 2d 306). The Court of Appeals reversed and remitted the appeal to this court, with a direction designed to give appellant ■’! opportunity to file a further appendix (17 N Y 2d 51). Motion granted to the following extent: Appeal set down for argument at the September Term, beginning September 7, 1966. The County Clerk, Nassau County, is directed to make available to appellant’s attorney, for the purpose of reproduction, the filed copy of the stenographic trial transcript. Appellant shall serve and file the record on appeal on or before July 8, 1966.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-p-reynolds-inc-v-nager-electric-co-nyappdiv-1966.