E & O Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

155 A.D.2d 292
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 14, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), dated April 6, 1988, which denied an application to dismiss this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the order of the respondent was not a "final” order from which review may ordinarily be taken, nevertheless the order is explicitly subject to judicial review pursuant to the provisions of the Rent Stabilization Code. (9 NYCRR 2529.8, 2530.1.) Further, inasmuch as petitioner challenges the authority of the respondent to reopen a prior final determination, the general rule barring judicial review does not apply. (People ex rel. Finnegan v McBride, 226 NY 252; Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.) Concur — Ross, J. P., Garro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E & O Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 155 A.D.2d 292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 292 (E & O Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaul v. Ward
159 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)