E. Newman & Co. v. Levy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

E. Newman & Co. v. Levy

26 La. Ann. 573

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 1874

DocketNo. 4516

StatusPublished

This text of 26 La. Ann. 573 (E. Newman & Co. v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. Newman & Co. v. Levy, 26 La. Ann. 573 (La. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyly, J.

In his petition for appeal, the defendant prayed that “E. [574]*574Newman & Co. be cited through Raoul Jumonville, liquidator, to answer the appeal.”- And, accordingly, citation was only served- on Jumonville. E. Newman was not cited. He had an interest in maintaining the judgment. The fault is imputable to the appellant.

Of our own motion, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, appellant paying costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyly, J.

In his petition for appeal, the defendant prayed that “E. [574]*574Newman & Co. be cited through Raoul Jumonville, liquidator, to answer the appeal.”- And, accordingly, citation was only served- on Jumonville. E. Newman was not cited. He had an interest in maintaining the judgment. The fault is imputable to the appellant.

Of our own motion, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, appellant paying costs.

Rehearing refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 La. Ann. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-newman-co-v-levy-la-1874.