E & N Properties v. Hippensteel

Michigan Supreme Court

E & N Properties v. Hippensteel

766 N.W.2d 841

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 2009

Docket138557

StatusPublished

This text of 766 N.W.2d 841 (E & N Properties v. Hippensteel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E & N Properties v. Hippensteel, 766 N.W.2d 841 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

766 N.W.2d 841 (2009)

E & N PROPERTIES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lyle HIPPENSTEEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138557. COA No. 287727.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

766 N.W.2d 841 (2009)

E & N PROPERTIES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lyle HIPPENSTEEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138557. COA No. 287727.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 N.W.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-n-properties-v-hippensteel-mich-2009.

Opinion

E & N PROPERTIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lyle HIPPENSTEEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Order

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

E & N PROPERTIES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lyle HIPPENSTEEL, Defendant-Appellant.