E. M. Tufts Canning Co. v. H. V. Stolz

271 A.D.2d 1040

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1040 (E. M. Tufts Canning Co. v. H. V. Stolz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E. M. Tufts Canning Co. v. H. V. Stolz, 271 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster and Russell, JJ., concur; Foster, J., taking no part. [See ante, p.'913.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-m-tufts-canning-co-v-h-v-stolz-nyappdiv-1947.