E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

241 A.D. 756

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint states a cause of action. (Potter v. Ellice, 48 N. Y. 321; Havens v. Patterson, 43 id. 218, 221; Cornell v. Hayden, 114 id. 271, 278; Lewis [757]*757v. Smith, 9 id. 502.) Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days after the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint states a cause of action. (Potter v. Ellice, 48 N. Y. 321; Havens v. Patterson, 43 id. 218, 221; Cornell v. Hayden, 114 id. 271, 278; Lewis [757]*757v. Smith, 9 id. 502.) Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days after the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick, 241 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 756 (E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related