E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

241 A.D. 756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 756 (E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick, 241 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint states a cause of action. (Potter v. Ellice, 48 N. Y. 321; Havens v. Patterson, 43 id. 218, 221; Cornell v. Hayden, 114 id. 271, 278; Lewis [757]*757v. Smith, 9 id. 502.) Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days after the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint states a cause of action. (Potter v. Ellice, 48 N. Y. 321; Havens v. Patterson, 43 id. 218, 221; Cornell v. Hayden, 114 id. 271, 278; Lewis [757]*757v. Smith, 9 id. 502.) Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days after the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-m-townsend-inc-v-skodnick-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack