E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1001, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2851
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 494
United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1968·No. No. P68/75; protests 60/4043 (A), etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Kao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” and “B” covered by -the foregoing protests consist of knives similar in all material respects to those the [1002]*1002subject of National Carloading Corp. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), except that the items marked “B” have wooden handles, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1001, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2851 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1001 (E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Carloading Corp. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 178 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)