E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark
135 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 487, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 207
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — if one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark, 135 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 487, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1927).
135 A. 916 (E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.