E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark
135 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 487, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 207
This text of 135 A. 916 (E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark, 135 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 487, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — if one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 487, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-m-land-co-v-bd-adjustment-newark-nj-1927.