E. J. Fay, Inc. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 193, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 997
United States Customs Court·Decided October 24, 1949·No. No. 53660; petition 6715-R (New York)·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was disclosed that there was an honest difference of opinion between the importer and the appraiser as to the proper basis of value to be adopted. An appeal to reappraisement was abandoned due to the fact that the shipper of the bottles would not cooperate in the matter by giving the desired information. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner in making the entry was without intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. J. Fay, Inc. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 193, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 997 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 193 (E. J. Fay, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. Z. Bernstein Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 477 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Empire State Chair Co. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 454 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)
Cabinet Craftsmen, Inc. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 448 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)