E. Howard Carson, Jr v. Tom Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 22, 2020
DocketA20D0366
StatusPublished

This text of E. Howard Carson, Jr v. Tom Brown (E. Howard Carson, Jr v. Tom Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E. Howard Carson, Jr v. Tom Brown, (Ga. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 04, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0366. E. HOWARD CARSON, JR, ET AL. v. TOM BROWN, ET AL.

E. Howard Carson, Jr. and Red Bull Holdings II, LLC (collectively, “Carson,”) filed a civil action against several officials with the Forsyth County Department of Planning and Community Development. The superior court partially granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, and we affirmed in part and reversed in part. See Carson v. Brown, 348 Ga. App. 689 (824 SE2d 605) (2019) (“Carson I”). After remittitur, the superior court entered an order which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied, in part, Carson’s request for mandamus. Carson then filed this application for discretionary review. As we concluded in Carson I, however, the discretionary appeal procedures do not apply to this case. 348 Ga. App. at 690-698 (1). Instead, the superior court’s order is subject to direct appeal. Id.1 We will grant a timely-filed application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED, and Carson shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the trial court. If he has already filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court, he need not file a second notice. The clerk of the civil court is directed to include a copy of this order in the appeal record transmitted to this Court.

1 “It is well established that any issue that was raised and resolved in an earlier appeal is the law of the case and is binding on this Court[.]” Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326, 327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (citations and punctuation omitted). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/04/2020 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. State
713 S.E.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Tom Brown v. E. Howard Carson, Jr.
824 S.E.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
E. Howard Carson, Jr v. Tom Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-howard-carson-jr-v-tom-brown-gactapp-2020.