E. Heller Brother v. . Continental Mills

135 N.E. 951, 233 N.Y. 641, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1063
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 1922·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. Heller Brother v. . Continental Mills, 135 N.E. 951, 233 N.Y. 641, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1063 (N.Y. 1922).

135 N.E. 951 (E. Heller Brother v. . Continental Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Society Brand Hat Co. v. Felco Fabrics Corp.
92 F. Supp. 499 (S.D. New York, 1950)
Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.
137 A. 807 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Thuman v. Clawson & Wilson Co.
211 A.D. 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Shirai v. Blum
207 A.D. 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.
139 N.E. 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.
203 A.D. 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
E. Stuffer & Co. v. Carbondale Mills, Inc.
119 Misc. 374 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)