E. H. McCutchen & Co. v. Bort

Supreme Court

E. H. McCutchen & Co. v. Bort

209 U.S. 547, 28 S. Ct. 758, 52 L. Ed. 920, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1697

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 13, 1908

DocketNo. 681

StatusPublished

This text of 209 U.S. 547 (E. H. McCutchen & Co. v. Bort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. H. McCutchen & Co. v. Bort, 209 U.S. 547, 28 S. Ct. 758, 52 L. Ed. 920, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1697 (1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

[548]*548No. 684.' Armand Schmoll, Petitioner, v. The United States. April 13, 1908. _ Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. W. Wickham Smith and Mr. John K. Maxwell for petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor-General for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

[548]*548No. 684.' Armand Schmoll, Petitioner, v. The United States. April 13, 1908. _ Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. W. Wickham Smith and Mr. John K. Maxwell for petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor-General for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 U.S. 547, 28 S. Ct. 758, 52 L. Ed. 920, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-h-mccutchen-co-v-bort-scotus-1908.