E. H. K. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E. H. K. v. State

405 So. 2d 495, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 3, 1981

DocketNo. 81-440

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 405 So. 2d 495 (E. H. K. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. H. K. v. State, 405 So. 2d 495, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

E. K. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency based upon a finding that he was guilty of burglary of an auto and petty theft.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the adjudication. We find the point well taken and reverse. The requisite elements to establish an adjudication for aiding and abetting are not present. Perez v. State, 390 So.2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); J. O. v. State, 384 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Pack v. State, 381 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Lockett v. State, 262 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Douglas v. State, 214 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. H. v. State, 370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); S. S. v. State, 405 So.2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

E. K. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency based upon a finding that he was guilty of burglary of an auto and petty theft.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the adjudication. We find the point well taken and reverse. The requisite elements to establish an adjudication for aiding and abetting are not present. Perez v. State, 390 So.2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); J. O. v. State, 384 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Pack v. State, 381 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Lockett v. State, 262 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Douglas v. State, 214 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. H. v. State, 370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); S. S. v. State, 405 So.2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

405 So. 2d 495, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-h-k-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack