E. H. Downs v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Texas

E. H. Downs v. Reed

134 S.W.2d 1059

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 7, 1939

DocketNo. 3548.

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W.2d 1059 (E. H. Downs v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. H. Downs v. Reed, 134 S.W.2d 1059 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

*1060 O’QUINN, Justice.

This suit originated in the justice court of Precinct No. 2 of Shelby County. Reed sued Downs for damages to his truck in the sum of $182.32 alleged to have resulted from Downs’ negligently driving his automobile into said truck. Judgment was for Reed in the sum of $182.32. The judgment was appealed to the county court of Shelby county. It was there tried to a jury and judgment was again for Reed in said sum. This appeal is from that judgment. From a careful consideration of the record, it is our conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Judgment affirmed without written opinion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Wade v. Pratt, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 1216; Farmers State Bank v. Harris, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 1216; General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Mallett, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 1119. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1060 O’QUINN, Justice.

This suit originated in the justice court of Precinct No. 2 of Shelby County. Reed sued Downs for damages to his truck in the sum of $182.32 alleged to have resulted from Downs’ negligently driving his automobile into said truck. Judgment was for Reed in the sum of $182.32. The judgment was appealed to the county court of Shelby county. It was there tried to a jury and judgment was again for Reed in said sum. This appeal is from that judgment. From a careful consideration of the record, it is our conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Judgment affirmed without written opinion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Wade v. Pratt, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 1216; Farmers State Bank v. Harris, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 1216; General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Mallett, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 1119. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.W.2d 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-h-downs-v-reed-texapp-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack