E. H. Ashley & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

E. H. Ashley & Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 387

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 4, 1956

DocketNo. 60268; protests 184684-K, etc. (Providence)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 387 (E. H. Ashley & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. H. Ashley & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 387 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-h-ashley-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.