E. G. Tillotson & Co. v. Ward
This text of 16 N.E.2d 1014 (E. G. Tillotson & Co. v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The lower court held the plaintiff corporation could maintain this action to collect a note due the company, notwithstanding its corporate charter had been cancelled by the Secretary of State, less than two years prior to 'the commencement of the action.
The judgment is affirmed on authority of Eversman v Ray Shipman Co., 115 Oh St 269, and Sweeny v Keystone Driller Co., 122 Oh St 16, and §8623-80, GC and related sections.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.E.2d 1014, 59 Ohio App. 50, 27 Ohio Law. Abs. 161, 12 Ohio Op. 367, 1938 Ohio App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-g-tillotson-co-v-ward-ohioctapp-1938.