E. G. Staude Mfg. Co. v. Berles Carton Co.

E.D. New York

E. G. Staude Mfg. Co. v. Berles Carton Co.

32 F. Supp. 573, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 654, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3143

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1940

DocketNo. 8641

StatusPublished

This text of 32 F. Supp. 573 (E. G. Staude Mfg. Co. v. Berles Carton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. G. Staude Mfg. Co. v. Berles Carton Co., 32 F. Supp. 573, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 654, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3143 (E.D.N.Y. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for a reargument.

All that is presented before me on this motion was considered by me before rendering my opinion on the original motion, now sought to be reargued, except certain letters, of which copies are presented and the alleged new matter in the petition and affidavits presented on behalf of the Intervener.

All of these letters were known by the Attorney for the Intervener, and the Intervener and its counsel, to be in existence, and the facts contained in the affidavits-were known to the Intervener, its attorney or Counsel, at the time of the argument of the original motion, and were not, but should have been, presented to me at that time.

In any event I find no reason on the law nor from anything contained in the letters or affidavits, whether it may be said to be new or old, which would cause me to change the opinion I expressed on deciding the original motion.

The motion to reargue is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI