E. C. Cropper & Co. v. Illinois Sewing Machine Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

E. C. Cropper & Co. v. Illinois Sewing Machine Co.

54 So. 849, 100 Miss. 127

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1911·Published

Opinion

Mayes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

After a most careful examination of the facts of this case, it is our judgment that Mr. Pox is not liable under section 3138, of the Code of 1906, as a general partner in the limited partnership firm of E. C. Cropper & Co. He did not transact any partnership business, nor act as agent for the partnership, in any sense contemplated by the statute. Reversed and remanded

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mayes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

After a most careful examination of the facts of this case, it is our judgment that Mr. Pox is not liable under section 3138, of the Code of 1906, as a general partner in the limited partnership firm of E. C. Cropper & Co. He did not transact any partnership business, nor act as agent for the partnership, in any sense contemplated by the statute. Reversed and remanded

E. C. Cropper & Co. v. Illinois Sewing Machine Co., 54 So. 849, 100 Miss. 127 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

54 So. 849 (E. C. Cropper & Co. v. Illinois Sewing Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.