E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 555

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 368 →

United States Customs Court·Decided May 16, 1958·No. No. 61942; protests 68222-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the merchandise imported, or withdrawn from warehouse, prior to January 1, 1948, was held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with France (T. D. 48346), and that imported, or withdrawn from warehouse, subsequent to said date was held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the merchandise imported, or withdrawn from warehouse, prior to January 1, 1948, was held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with France (T. D. 48346), and that imported, or withdrawn from warehouse, subsequent to said date was held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802.

E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 555 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

40 Cust. Ct. 555 (E. C. Carter & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related