E-Bai Koo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

E-Bai Koo v. City of New York

100 A.D.2d 761, 473 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 761 (E-Bai Koo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E-Bai Koo v. City of New York, 100 A.D.2d 761, 473 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerard M. Weisberg, J.), entered on December 16,1982, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, to the extent appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to plaintiff E-Bai Koo, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of said plaintiff E-Bai Koo to $750,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so [762]*762amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. 11 After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerard M. Weisberg, J.), entered on December 16,1982, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, to the extent appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to plaintiff E-Bai Koo, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of said plaintiff E-Bai Koo to $750,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so [762]*762amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. 11 After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 761, 473 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-bai-koo-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1984.