E. Arthur Tutein, Inc. v. Hudson Valley Coke & Products Corp.
This text of 162 N.E. 592 (E. Arthur Tutein, Inc. v. Hudson Valley Coke & Products Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the contract between the parties, upon the refusal of Mr. Schulte to act as third arbitrator, before any evidence was produced, Mr. Schwab was empowered to name another to serve in his place. The orders should be reversed, with costs in all courts; the first question certified answered in the affirmative and the second and third questions in the negative.
■ Cardozo, Ch. J., Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Pound, J., dissents; Crane, J., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 N.E. 592, 249 N.Y. 84, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-arthur-tutein-inc-v-hudson-valley-coke-products-corp-ny-1928.