E-Advance Services, LLC v. Your Answer Solutions Center Inc

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 2024
Docket8:23-cv-02466
StatusUnknown

This text of E-Advance Services, LLC v. Your Answer Solutions Center Inc (E-Advance Services, LLC v. Your Answer Solutions Center Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E-Advance Services, LLC v. Your Answer Solutions Center Inc, (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

E-ADVANCE SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a CANACAP,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:23-cv-2466-KKM-NHA

YOUR ANSWER SOLUTIONS CENTER, INC., and HECTOR ZUNIGA,

Defendants. _______________________________________/

ORDER Plaintiff’s motion for entry of Clerk’s default (Doc. 21) is granted. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), the Clerk is directed to enter default against Your Answer Solutions Center Inc. (“YAS”) and Hector Zuniga. On October 27, 2023, Plaintiff E-Advance Services, LLC, brought this suit alleging breach of contract against YAS, and breach of personal guaranty against Mr. Zuniga. Doc. 1. Plaintiff served both Defendants on November 8, 2023. Doc. 14. Defendants have failed to answer or otherwise respond, and Plaintiff timely moves for entry of clerk’s default against them (Doc. 21). “When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). However, “[i]n the absence of service of process (or waiver of service by the defendant), a court ordinarily may not exercise power over a party the

complaint names as defendant.” Murphy Bros. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999). And, “[g]enerally, where service of process is insufficient, the court has no power to render judgment.” In re Worldwide Web Sys., Inc., 328 F.3d 1291, 1299 (11th Cir. 2003).

Service on Hector Zuniga Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) governs the service of process on individuals. It provides that a party may serve an individual by “delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally.” FED.

R. CIV. P. 4(e)(2)(A). As to Mr. Zuniga, Plaintiff did just that. Doc. 14, p. 2. On November 8, 2023, the process server delivered a copy of the summons and complaint to Mr. Zuniga, personally, at his residence. Id.

Service on YAS Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1) provides two methods by which a corporation may be served within the United States, one of which is by service in accordance with the law of the state where the district court is

located or where service is made. FED. R. CIV. P. 4(h)(1)(A), (e)(1). Florida law provides that a party may serve a corporation by “service on its registered agent designated by the corporation.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 48.081(2). The Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations records list YAS’s registered agent as Hector Zuniga with an address of 12046 Forest Park

Circle, Lakewood Ranch, Florida 34211.1 Plaintiff served YAS by leaving the required documents with Mr. Zuniga, at the listed address, and informing him “of the contents thereof.” Doc. 14, p. 1. Default

Plaintiffs served both Defendants on November 8, 2023. Defendants were required to answer or respond by November 29, 2023. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Neither Defendant has answered or otherwise demonstrated an intent to defend this suit, and the time to do so has expired.

The Court directed Plaintiff to move for clerk’s default by February 7, 2024 (Doc. 20), and Plaintiff did so on February 5, 2024, (Doc. 21). The motion is due to be granted.

1 Records of the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations, are available at www.sunbiz.org, a verified website of a public agency. Federal Rule of Evidence 201 permits courts to take judicial notice of “a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it[ ] ... can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). “The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(d). Conclusion Because Plaintiff has served both Defendants, neither Defendant has timely responded, and Plaintiff has timely moved for Clerk’s default, Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default against Defendants YAS and Hector Zuniga. Pursuant to Local Rule 1.10(c), Plaintiff shall, within 35 days of entry of the Clerk's default, apply for default judgment or file a paper identifying each unresolved issue necessary to entry of the default judgment. ORDERED on February 12, 2024.

Mola HIRT ADAMS United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
E-Advance Services, LLC v. Your Answer Solutions Center Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-advance-services-llc-v-your-answer-solutions-center-inc-flmd-2024.