E & A Restaurants of the Keys, Inc. v. Bernreuter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

E & A Restaurants of the Keys, Inc. v. Bernreuter

589 So. 2d 436, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1991 WL 240072

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1185

StatusPublished

This text of 589 So. 2d 436 (E & A Restaurants of the Keys, Inc. v. Bernreuter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E & A Restaurants of the Keys, Inc. v. Bernreuter, 589 So. 2d 436, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1991 WL 240072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The order awarding the plaintiffs attorney’s fees purportedly pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), is reversed. It is clear that the proceedings below with respect to the demand for judgment and its rejection did not comply with the procedural requirements of the then-applicable statute, which were, in any event, declared invalid in The Florida Bar re: Amendment to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.442, 550 So.2d 442 (Fla.1989). Moreover, the pertinent events took place before the effective date of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 (with the requirements of which the plaintiffs likewise did not comply). See Reinhardt v. Bono, 564 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We completely reject the view that there was or is any free-form substantive right to attorney’s fees upon a generalized “unreasonable” rejection of a “reasonable” offer which is or was subject to enforcement by the court. See Milton v. Leapai, 562 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See generally High Ridge Management Corp. v. State, 354 So.2d 377 (Fla.1977).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The order awarding the plaintiffs attorney’s fees purportedly pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), is reversed. It is clear that the proceedings below with respect to the demand for judgment and its rejection did not comply with the procedural requirements of the then-applicable statute, which were, in any event, declared invalid in The Florida Bar re: Amendment to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.442, 550 So.2d 442 (Fla.1989). Moreover, the pertinent events took place before the effective date of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 (with the requirements of which the plaintiffs likewise did not comply). See Reinhardt v. Bono, 564 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We completely reject the view that there was or is any free-form substantive right to attorney’s fees upon a generalized “unreasonable” rejection of a “reasonable” offer which is or was subject to enforcement by the court. See Milton v. Leapai, 562 So.2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See generally High Ridge Management Corp. v. State, 354 So.2d 377 (Fla.1977).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 So. 2d 436, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1991 WL 240072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-a-restaurants-of-the-keys-inc-v-bernreuter-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack