E. A. Pflueger Co. v. Enterprise Manufacturing Co.
This text of 85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450 (E. A. Pflueger Co. v. Enterprise Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified as provided in the journal entry.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, modified so that it shall read as follows:
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant company, its officers, agents and employes, be and they are hereby perpetually enjoined from either directly or indirectly using or [451]*451causing to be used the word “Pflueger” whether in print or other graphic form in connection with its business; provided, however, that it may use its present corporate name and the name of Ernest A. Pflueger as its officer in connection with said business, upon the following terms and conditions, and not otherwise: the word “Pflueger” therein shall never be made more conspicuous than the rest of such name. It is further ordered and adjudged that the relief prayed for against Ernest A. Pflueger individually be and the same is denied and the petition is dismissed against him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-a-pflueger-co-v-enterprise-manufacturing-co-ohio-1911.