E. A. Hoyt & Co. v. Sheffield

40 Ga. 492

Opinion

Complaint and motion for new trial, from Thomas.

The writ of error in this case was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu, because counsel for plaintiffs in error failed “ on or before the calling of the cause on the docket for a hearing” to furnish to each of the Judges and to the Reporter a printed or plainly written copy of the bill of exceptions,” as is required by Rule 12th of the Supreme Court. See 38th Georgia Reports, 690.