E. A. Hoyt & Co. v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

E. A. Hoyt & Co. v. Sheffield

40 Ga. 492

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ga. 492 (E. A. Hoyt & Co. v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. A. Hoyt & Co. v. Sheffield, 40 Ga. 492 (Ga. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Complaint and motion for new trial, from Thomas.

The writ of error in this case was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu, because counsel for plaintiffs in error failed “ on or before the calling of the cause on the docket for a hearing” to furnish to each of the Judges and to the Reporter a printed or plainly written copy of the bill of exceptions,” as is required by Rule 12th of the Supreme Court. See 38th Georgia Reports, 690.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Complaint and motion for new trial, from Thomas.

The writ of error in this case was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu, because counsel for plaintiffs in error failed “ on or before the calling of the cause on the docket for a hearing” to furnish to each of the Judges and to the Reporter a printed or plainly written copy of the bill of exceptions,” as is required by Rule 12th of the Supreme Court. See 38th Georgia Reports, 690.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ga. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-a-hoyt-co-v-sheffield-ga-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack