E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.

738 A.2d 655, 250 Conn. 929, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 349

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 9, 1999

DocketSC 16184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 738 A.2d 655 (E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E & A Development, Inc. v. Paragon Builders of Connecticut, Inc., 738 A.2d 655, 250 Conn. 929, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 349 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 355 (AC 18226), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s claim is moot because the funds had already been distributed in accordance with the trial court’s order discharging the mechanic’s lien?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that because the trial court properly discharged the mechanic’s lien, there was no need for the funds to have been held as security?

[930]*930Decided September 9, 1999 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16184. Lawrence P. Weisman, in support of the petition.

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s claim is moot because we can no longer grant any practical relief?

“4. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the decision of the trial court discharging the mechanic’s lien without imposing the seven day stay mandated by General Statutes § 49-35c (b) was correct?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI