Dziurak v. Chase Manhattan Bank
This text of 44 N.Y. 776 (Dziurak v. Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
A cashier’s check is the primary obligation of the issuing bank which, acting as both drawer and drawee, accepts the check upon its issuance. (Matter of Bank of United States, 243 App Div 287, 291; Moon Over the Mountain v Marine Midland Bank, 87 Misc 2d 918, 920.) As such, a cashier’s check does not constitute an item payable for a customer’s account within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 4-403 of the Uniform Commercial Code. (White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code, § 17-5, p 579, n 91.) Consequently, respondent was under no legal obligation to honor appellant’s order to stop payment. [778]*778(Bobrick v Second Nat. Bank of Hoboken, 175 App Div 550, 553, affd 224 NY 637; Bunge Corp. v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 31 NY2d 223, 234 [dissenting opn, Breitel, J.]; Kaufman v Chase Manhattan Bank Nat. Assoc., 370 F Supp 276, 278.)
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 N.Y. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dziurak-v-chase-manhattan-bank-ny-1978.