Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company
This text of 969 N.E.2d 1162 (Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD3d 1493, 1495-1497 [2011]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dzielski-v-essex-insurance-company-ny-2012.