Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company

New York Court of Appeals

Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company

969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2012·No. 149 SSM 22·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD3d 1493, 1495-1497 [2011]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD3d 1493, 1495-1497 [2011]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company, 969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279 (N.Y. 2012).

Pincite

969 N.E.2d 1162 (Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related