Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company

969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 5, 2012
Docket149 SSM 22
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 969 N.E.2d 1162 (Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dzielski v. Essex Insurance Company, 969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279 (N.Y. 2012).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD3d 1493, 1495-1497 [2011]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Country-Wide Insurance Co. v. Excelsior Insurance Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. Beckerman
120 A.D.3d 1215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Dzielski v. Essex Insurance
974 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
969 N.E.2d 1162, 19 N.Y.3d 871, 947 N.Y.S.2d 47, 2012 NY Slip Op 4279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dzielski-v-essex-insurance-company-ny-2012.