Dyson v. State
959 So. 2d 210, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 302, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 957, 2007 WL 1556725
Opinion
We initially accepted review of the decision in Dyson v. State, 934 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), and State v. Ferreira, 840 So.2d 304 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Upon further consideration we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyson v. State, 959 So. 2d 210, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 302, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 957, 2007 WL 1556725 (Fla. 2007).
959 So. 2d 210 (Dyson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Dyson v. State
934 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Ferreira
840 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)