Dyson v. Dyson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dyson v. Dyson

92 A.D.2d 857, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17231

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 92 A.D.2d 857 (Dyson v. Dyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyson v. Dyson, 92 A.D.2d 857, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a divorce action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme [858]*858Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated April 20, 1982, as granted plaintiff’s cross motion to the extent that defendant was directed to pay temporary maintenance to the plaintiff in the sum of $500 per week. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and cross motion denied with leave to renew as to temporary maintenance should defendant reduce the level of support he was providing prior to April 20,1982. In view of the wife’s substantial personal assets, the trial court’s award to her of temporary maintenance of $500 per week was an abuse of discretion (see Horn v Horn, 76 AD2d 826; Thea v Thea, 75 AD2d 618; Heller v Heller, 38 AD2d 526; Mendelsohn v Mendelsohn, 36 AD2d 952; Spellman v Spellman, 33 AD2d 683). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a divorce action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme [858]*858Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated April 20, 1982, as granted plaintiff’s cross motion to the extent that defendant was directed to pay temporary maintenance to the plaintiff in the sum of $500 per week. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and cross motion denied with leave to renew as to temporary maintenance should defendant reduce the level of support he was providing prior to April 20,1982. In view of the wife’s substantial personal assets, the trial court’s award to her of temporary maintenance of $500 per week was an abuse of discretion (see Horn v Horn, 76 AD2d 826; Thea v Thea, 75 AD2d 618; Heller v Heller, 38 AD2d 526; Mendelsohn v Mendelsohn, 36 AD2d 952; Spellman v Spellman, 33 AD2d 683). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 857, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyson-v-dyson-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack