Dyson v. Bridges
992 So. 2d 929, 2008 WL 4574652
Opinion
Jimmie DYSON, Nikita Dyson, Muriel Dyson, Jr., Tamara Dyson, Jaron Dyson, and Julius Dyson, All Individually and on Behalf of Their Deceased Father/Husband, Muriel Dyson
v.
Dr. Charlie BRIDGES, Charlie Bridges, APMC, Dr. Giath Mikdadi, and the State of Louisiana, Through the Louisiana State University Medical Center, Health Sciences Center and Lallie Kemp Medical Center.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied. As observed by the court of appeal, it appears the constitutional issue is moot. To the extent it is not moot, relators will have an adequate opportunity to seek review of the standing issue if and when the trial court addresses constitutionality. See Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Hon. Rebecca M. Olivier, 04-2147 (La.1/19/05), 892 So.2d 570.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyson v. Bridges, 992 So. 2d 929, 2008 WL 4574652 (La. 2008).
992 So. 2d 929 (Dyson v. Bridges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier
892 So. 2d 570 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2005)