Dysart v. Logan

25 Ky. 428, 2 J.J. Marsh. 428, 1829 Ky. LEXIS 121
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 22, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ky. 428 (Dysart v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dysart v. Logan, 25 Ky. 428, 2 J.J. Marsh. 428, 1829 Ky. LEXIS 121 (Ky. Ct. App. 1829).

Opinion

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

B. Logan sued S. Dysart on the following note: “On or before the first day of March, 1820, we or either of us promise to pay Benjamin Logan, the full sum of $143, with interest at the rate of 12 per cent, from the dale. Witness our hands and seals this 7th day of September, 1819.

“SÁML. DYSART, [Seal.]

“JOHNSON DYSART, [Seal.]”

Dysart failing to plead, the court rendered judgment against him, for $1.43, with 12 per cent, interest thereon, from the 7th of March, 1819-, to the day of the judgment, and for six per cent, interest after that time.

By the act of 1819, February @th, II. Digest, 1226, it is declared, that all bonds, contracts, &c. for payment of money or goods lent, on which a higher interest than six. per centum per annum, shall have been, reserved, shall be void to the extent of the excess of the amount reserved over six per cent.

The bond, i.n this case shows on its face, that more than six per cent, interest was reserved for the forbearance of th© principal. That which appears,, need not be pleaded or averred. The court was as much bound to notj.ee the usury, as if it had been averred by the most formal plea. In rendering judgment by default, the court bad a right to give judgment for only so much as the plaintiff below showed himself entitled to. His declaration showed clearly,, that he was not entitled, legally, to the whole of the 12; per cent, because the bond is void for all over six per cent, and no judgment can be maintained for that which the record proves to be illegal,.

Wherefore, the judgments reversed and the cause remanded, for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ky. 428, 2 J.J. Marsh. 428, 1829 Ky. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dysart-v-logan-kyctapp-1829.