Dysart v. Cummings

650 S.E.2d 593

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dysart v. Cummings. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 N.C. 580 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 12, 2007·No. 132A07·Published

Opinion

650 S.E.2d 593 (2007)

Christian Emerson DYSART and Mildred Maxwell Dysart
v.
William Kent CUMMINGS and Kimberly N. Cummings.

No. 132A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Boyce & Isley, PLLC, by Philip R. Isley, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellees.

John Walter Bryant, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

650 S.E.2d 593 (2007)

Christian Emerson DYSART and Mildred Maxwell Dysart
v.
William Kent CUMMINGS and Kimberly N. Cummings.

No. 132A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Boyce & Isley, PLLC, by Philip R. Isley, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellees.

John Walter Bryant, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Dysart v. Cummings, 650 S.E.2d 593 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

650 S.E.2d 593 (Dysart v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.