Dysart v. Boynton

14 F.2d 1022, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2154
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1926
DocketNo. 4872
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.2d 1022 (Dysart v. Boynton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dysart v. Boynton, 14 F.2d 1022, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2154 (5th Cir. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It not. appearing that any proposed bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge during the term of the court at which petitioner was tried, or during the further time allowed by any order made in that regard, the petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.2d 1022, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dysart-v-boynton-ca5-1926.