Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al.

S.D. New York

Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al.

DecidedOctober 3, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-00811

StatusUnknown

This text of Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al. (Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X DYRON MORRIS JACKSON, 25-CV-811 (JPO) (VF) Plaintiff,

ORDER -against- DR. EARNEST BONAPARTE, et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on September 26, 2025. See ECF No. 21. The primary purpose of IFP status is to permit a plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff filed the complaint on January 28, 2025, and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s IFP application is therefore moot. See, e.g., Button v. New York Times Co., No. 24-CV-05888 (MKV), 2024 WL 4751363, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2024) (denying IFP application where plaintiff previously paid the filing fee). If Plaintiff is concerned about the payment of fees on PACER, Plaintiff does not have to pay the PACER fees for the first copy of a document. See https://www.uscourts.gov/court- programs/fees/electronic-public-access-fee-schedule (“Parties in a case (including pro se litigants) and attorneys of record receive one free electronic copy, via the notice of electronic filing or notice of docket activity, of all documents filed electronically[.]”). SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York October 3, 2025

VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X DYRON MORRIS JACKSON, 25-CV-811 (JPO) (VF) Plaintiff,

ORDER -against- DR. EARNEST BONAPARTE, et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on September 26, 2025. See ECF No. 21. The primary purpose of IFP status is to permit a plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff filed the complaint on January 28, 2025, and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s IFP application is therefore moot. See, e.g., Button v. New York Times Co., No. 24-CV-05888 (MKV), 2024 WL 4751363, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2024) (denying IFP application where plaintiff previously paid the filing fee). If Plaintiff is concerned about the payment of fees on PACER, Plaintiff does not have to pay the PACER fees for the first copy of a document. See https://www.uscourts.gov/court- programs/fees/electronic-public-access-fee-schedule (“Parties in a case (including pro se litigants) and attorneys of record receive one free electronic copy, via the notice of electronic filing or notice of docket activity, of all documents filed electronically[.]”). SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York October 3, 2025

VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Dyron Morris Jackson v. Dr. Earnest Bonaparte, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyron-morris-jackson-v-dr-earnest-bonaparte-et-al-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack