Dyll v. Bell Telephone Co.
This text of 572 A.2d 1 (Dyll v. Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[330]*330ORDER
AND NOW, this first day of March, 1990, the order entered January 5, 1990, 524 Pa. 608, 569 A.2d 1367, denying the petition for allowance of appeal in the above captioned matter is hereby VACATED. The petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED and is to be CONSOLIDATED with James Hackenberg v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, and Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, and Travelers Insurance Company, 524 Pa. 597, 568 A.2d 1247 for argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 A.2d 1, 524 Pa. 329, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dyll-v-bell-telephone-co-pa-1990.