Dykman v. United States Life Insurance

68 N.E. 362, 176 N.Y. 299, 14 Bedell 299, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 804
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 N.E. 362 (Dykman v. United States Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dykman v. United States Life Insurance, 68 N.E. 362, 176 N.Y. 299, 14 Bedell 299, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 804 (N.Y. 1903).

Opinion

Bartlett, J.

The learned counsel for the plaintiff insists that the complaint sets forth an action for money had and received and that the issues are triable by a jury.

A carefully drawn complaint, covering nine printed pages, - sets forth in substance that plaintiff’s testator, within five months of his death, purchased an annuity of the defendant when he had long been addicted to habits of gross intemperance, which led to a- diseased, disordered, irrational and unsound mental condition, of which. defendant had due notice.

That plaintiff’s testator paid $100,000 for an annuity of *301 $7,640.00 during life, payable in quarterly payments of $1,910; that one quarterly payment was paid and before another became due the testator died.

There are other allegations in the complaint that need not be referred to at this time.

The prayer of the complaint is, in substance :

1. That the contract of annuity be adjudged void and that the same be canceled and set aside.
2. That the defendant be adjudged to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $100,000.00, with interest, less any sum, 'with interest, that defendant has paid out under the contract.
3. Prayer for costs.

This is an action in equity praying for relief that only a court of chancery can grant.

The learned Appellate Division has certified to us this question:

“ Are the plaintiffs in this action, upon the pleadings herein, entitled as a matter of right to a trial by jury, under the provisions of section 968 of the Code of Civil Procedure ? ”

The question is answered in the negative.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Brien, Martin, Yann and Werneb, JJ., concur; Cullen, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Tisdale
171 Misc. 2d 716 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1997)
In re the Estate of Aronoff
171 Misc. 2d 172 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.E. 362, 176 N.Y. 299, 14 Bedell 299, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykman-v-united-states-life-insurance-ny-1903.