Dykes v. State

858 S.W.2d 872, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289, 1993 WL 308459
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 17, 1993
DocketNo. 18406
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 858 S.W.2d 872 (Dykes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dykes v. State, 858 S.W.2d 872, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289, 1993 WL 308459 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PREWITT, Judge.

The trial judge denied movant’s motion filed under Rule 24.035 as it was not timely filed. Movant contends that the filing time of Rule 24.035(b) denied him due process of law. Missouri courts have repeatedly held that the time requirement does not violate due process. See Lestourgeon v. State, 837 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo.App.1992).

The judgment is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and GARRISON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snipes v. State
871 S.W.2d 114 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 S.W.2d 872, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289, 1993 WL 308459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykes-v-state-moctapp-1993.