Dykes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dykes v. State

858 S.W.2d 872, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289, 1993 WL 308459

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 17, 1993·No. No. 18406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PREWITT, Judge.

The trial judge denied movant’s motion filed under Rule 24.035 as it was not timely filed. Movant contends that the filing time of Rule 24.035(b) denied him due process of law. Missouri courts have repeatedly held that the time requirement does not violate due process. See Lestourgeon v. State, 837 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo.App.1992).

The judgment is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and GARRISON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PREWITT, Judge.

The trial judge denied movant’s motion filed under Rule 24.035 as it was not timely filed. Movant contends that the filing time of Rule 24.035(b) denied him due process of law. Missouri courts have repeatedly held that the time requirement does not violate due process. See Lestourgeon v. State, 837 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo.App.1992).

The judgment is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and GARRISON, J., concur.

Dykes v. State, 858 S.W.2d 872, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289, 1993 WL 308459 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

858 S.W.2d 872 (Dykes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related