Dykes v. State

576 So. 2d 847, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 1991 WL 33000
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1309
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 576 So. 2d 847 (Dykes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dykes v. State, 576 So. 2d 847, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 1991 WL 33000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

As to each of four forgery convictions (Counts I, II, III and IV of the information in case no. 89-7947), the trial court imposed a probationary split sentence of two years incarceration followed by one year of probation and then ordered each sentence to run consecutive to each other. We vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing because the sentences as imposed result in consecutive periods of incarceration interrupted by probation, contrary to Turner v. State, 551 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

SENTENCES VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. State
579 So. 2d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 So. 2d 847, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2197, 1991 WL 33000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykes-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.