Dykes v. State Ex Rel.
This text of 191 So. 309 (Dykes v. State Ex Rel.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This writ of error is from an order of the Circuit Court of Lake County overruling a motion to quash and ordering that a peremptory writ be issued in the ■ cause.- ;The' record and the- briefs have been examined and *189 the only question brought up for our consideration is the interpretation of Section 9 of Chapter 18296, Acts of 1937, the point of controversy being whether the redemption period provided therein expires in two or four years.
This identical question was before the Court in State ex rel. F. T. Hurner v. Myrtle M. Culbreath, et al., decided this date, where we held that the redemption period expired in two years from the date of the passage of the Act. The court below held that it expired in four years. His judgment is accordingly reversed on authority of the last cited case.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 So. 309, 140 Fla. 188, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykes-v-state-ex-rel-fla-1939.