Dykes v. Rago
225 A.D.2d 696, 639 N.Y.2d 937, 639 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
After the order appealed from was entered, the father sought to modify visitation. His application was granted, and he was permitted expanded, unsupervised visitation. The mother did not appeal from the court’s subsequent order, which supersedes the order appealed from and renders this appeal academic. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dykes v. Rago, 225 A.D.2d 696, 639 N.Y.2d 937, 639 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 696 (Dykes v. Rago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Lobb v. Nanetti
2021 NY Slip Op 01777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)