Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Dykes v. Rago

Dykes v. Rago

225 A.D.2d 696, 639 N.Y.2d 937, 639 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 696 (Dykes v. Rago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dykes v. Rago, 225 A.D.2d 696, 639 N.Y.2d 937, 639 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

After the order appealed from was entered, the father sought to modify visitation. His application was granted, and he was permitted expanded, unsupervised visitation. The mother did not appeal from the court’s subsequent order, which supersedes the order appealed from and renders this appeal academic. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lobb v. Nanetti
2021 NY Slip Op 01777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 696, 639 N.Y.2d 937, 639 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykes-v-rago-nyappdiv-1996.