Dykes v. McClung

74 Ga. 382, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 2, 1884·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[Mrs. Bettie McOlung filed her petition to set aside a judgment against her in favor of W. M. Dykes, based on the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain realty. Two grounds for the motion were stated:

[383]*383(1.) Because the only service of the rule nisi to foreclose the mortgage was by leaving a copy at the residence of the defendant, as appeared from the entry of the sheriff.

(2.) Because the record showed on its face that the judgment against her was illegal.

The record of the foreclosure showed that J. II. McClung, the husband of the movant, made a note to J. F. Lewis & Son, with Dykes as security; that to secure the latter against loss, McClung and his wife made the mortgage to him; that he was compelled to pay the debt, and thereupon proceeded to foreclose the mortgage against the husband and wife; that service was made by the sheriff by leaving a copy at the residence of the defendants; and that no cause being shown against the foreclosure, a rule absolute was granted.

The court granted the motion and set aside the judgment as to the movant. Respondent excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykes v. McClung, 74 Ga. 382, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1884).

74 Ga. 382 (Dykes v. McClung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co. v. Clark
101 S.E. 536 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Atwood v. Hirsch
51 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hobby v. Bunch
10 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Meeks v. Johnson
75 Ga. 629 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)