Dykes v. Commissioner

1971 T.C. Memo. 266, 30 T.C.M. 1141, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 65
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1971
DocketDocket No. 2562-70.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1971 T.C. Memo. 266 (Dykes v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dykes v. Commissioner, 1971 T.C. Memo. 266, 30 T.C.M. 1141, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 65 (tax 1971).

Opinion

Donald R. Dykes and Essie J. Dykes v. Commissioner.
Dykes v. Commissioner
Docket No. 2562-70.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1971-266; 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 65; 30 T.C.M. (CCH) 1141; T.C.M. (RIA) 71266;
October 18, 1971, Filed.
James D. Webb III, 920 Hartford Bldg., Dallas, Tex., for the petitioners. W. John Howard, Jr., for the respondent.

DAWSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes for the years 1966 and 1967 in the respective amounts of $777.84 and $468.68. The only issue for decision is whether*66 the compensation received by petitioner Essie J. Dykes during 1966 and 1967 from the United States Employees' Association of Tehran, Iran, constituted payments by an agency of the United States and was thus not excludable from petitioners' gross income under section 911(a). 1

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.

Donald R. Dykes and Essie J. Dykes (herein called petitioners) are husband and wife and citizens of the United States who were residing in Iran during 1966 and 1967. They were legal residents of Greenville, Texas, on the date the petition in this case was filed. Petitioners filed their joint Federal income tax returns for the years 1966 and 1967 with the district director of internal revenue, Austin, Texas, and the director of international operations, Washington, D.C., respectively.

Donald R. Dykes was on active duty with the United States Air Force prior to and during the years here involved. When he was assigned to his post in Iran, Essie J. Dykes (herein called petitioner) and their two children accompanied him*67 as his dependents. From March 1965 to June 1967, petitioners and their children resided in Tehran in a private home rented from an Iranian national.

Before they departed for Iran petitioners received information about the United States Employees' Association and its main function of providing members with grocery and drug items from the United States at prices lower than those in effect elsewhere in Tehran. Petitioners joined the Association by paying membership fees of $150. A portion of this sum was refunded to petitioners when the Association became able to reduce its fees due to an increased membership. The balance of the fee paid was refunded when petitioners left Iran in 1967.

When petitioner Essie J. Dykes arrived in Tehran she was not employed. In August 1965, she applied for employment with the United States Employees' Association. Petitioner was interviewed by Mr. Sells, the general manager of the Association. In October 1965, she was employed as a cashier 1142 and checker in the Association's commissary or grocery store. After three months petitioner was made a clerk in the Association's shipping department, which distributed merchandise to members outside of Tehran*68 who could not shop in person at the Association store. Petitioner was paid by check on the first and fifteenth of each month. The check was drawn on the Association's United States checking account in United States dollars.

The Association had its own compound surrounded by a fence and high walls, with a parking area for customers at the front and a loading dock at the rear. This was not part of the United States Embassy compound. Located within the compound were two buildings. A restaurant and bar were in one building while the other contained the grocery store where food, drugs and other household items were sold, a rental agency where various items were available for rental by members, a book store and warehouse. Two Iranian guards were employed by the Association at the compound. One directed traffic while the other acted as a security officer.

The Association obtained its merchandise from individuals or corporations normally engaged in supplying products at wholesale in foreign commerce. Produce and perishables were obtained on the local Iranian market. No goods were purchased from the United States Government or Armed Services and no products that were United States Government*69 issue, normally available in commissaries operated by the Air Force, were sold at the Association store. In pricing its merchandise, the Association attempted to restrict its profit margins as much as possible and prices were based on original cost, losses incurred through spoilage or damage and insurance costs.

The Association maintained no place of business within the United States and, with the exception of a bank account maintained there, conducted no other activities there. Its address is "American Embassy, Tehran, Iran, APO New York 09205." The Association is not a commissary operated by the Armed Forces of the United States.

An open membership meeting was held by the Association at least once each year at which time the financial reports were discussed and any required changes in operation were considered. The financial statements, which were distributed to the membership annually, were audited by a firm of English public accountants retained by the Association.

The Association had some members who were not United States citizens. It also had employees who were not United States citizens. In addition, there were persons who were neither members of the Association nor United*70 States citizens who on occasion made use of its shopping facilities.

The Association is operated under a Constitution and By-laws. It was organized to offer recreational activities for its members and their dependents as well as food and other items at minimum prices which are consistent with good service and efficient management. All monies, including membership fees, deposits and operating revenue derived by the Association were to be used for this purpose. The constitution was adopted upon the approval of the Ambassador on November 3, 1964, and provides in pertinent part:

ARTICLE II. Membership

1. Membership in the Association is limited to United States citizens who are not permanent residents of Iran and who by the nature of their duty assignments in Iran are permitted under agreement with the Government of Iran to import goods duty-free for themselves and their dependents, except that such membership will not be open to dependents of individuals who do not enjoy duty-free entry privileges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. Johnson
316 U.S. 481 (Supreme Court, 1942)
United States v. Fernando S. Forfari
268 F.2d 29 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Krichbaum v. United States
138 F. Supp. 515 (E.D. Tennessee, 1956)
Teskey v. Commissioner
30 T.C. 456 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Raffensperger v. Commissioner
33 T.C. 1097 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Donaldson v. Commissioner
51 T.C. 830 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Air Force Central Welfare Fund v. Henderson
1971 OK 46 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1971 T.C. Memo. 266, 30 T.C.M. 1141, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykes-v-commissioner-tax-1971.