Dykema Gossett, Pllc v. Ajluni
This text of 739 N.W.2d 629 (Dykema Gossett, Pllc v. Ajluni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DYKEMA GOSSETT, PLLC, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Roger M. AJLUNI, M.D., Medical Fitness Center, and RMA Physicians, PC, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we AFFIRM the result reached by the Court of Appeals, but we VACATE Part II of the Court of Appeals opinion and judgment, for the reasons stated in the separate Court of Appeals opinion of Judge Jansen, who concurred in part and dissented in part.
*630 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 N.W.2d 629, 480 Mich. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dykema-gossett-pllc-v-ajluni-mich-2007.