Dyke v. Spargur
143 N.Y. 651
Opinion
All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dyke v. Spargur, 143 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1894).
143 N.Y. 651 (Dyke v. Spargur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schick v. Wolf
207 A.D. 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Golde Clothes Shop, Inc. v. Loew's Buffalo Theatres, Inc.
141 N.E. 917 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Town of Babylon v. . Darling
100 N.E. 727 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Marion Trust Co. v. Bennett
82 N.E. 782 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
Davis v. Holbrook
25 Colo. 493 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1898)
Rhoades v. Freeman
9 A.D. 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)