Dygert v. Coppernoll

13 Johns. 210
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1816·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No set-off can be allowed,^except, it.be against a claim founded in con tract,, express .or implied. The, minutes.^ of the ‘ former judgment are equivocal and uncertain • as to the cause of action. , Trespass on the case may be for tort or contract; and, to explain that ambiguity, the written declaration. which the justice had left at home was the best evidence ; and, therefore,., the parol evidence to that point was properly excluded.,

The judgment ought to be affirmed.--

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dygert v. Coppernoll, 13 Johns. 210 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

13 Johns. 210 (Dygert v. Coppernoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gleason v. Smith
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Jolley v. Foltz
34 Cal. 321 (California Supreme Court, 1867)