Dyett v. Seymour

2 N.Y.S. 842, 19 N.Y. St. Rep. 714, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 873
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dyett v. Seymour. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 N.Y.S. 841
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 23, 1888·Published

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

In another appeal, founded upon the same facts as are disclosed by these papers at the present term, we have affirmed an order directing the examination of the defendants herein. Ante, 841. This is all the relief that the plaintiff, in our judgment, in the present stage of this action, is entitled to. Upon their examination before trial, the defendants can be compelled to produce their books as upon the trial, and can be compelled to refer to them for the purpose of answering proper inquiries as upon the trial, and thus the plaintiff can procure all the information to which he is entitled. If it should subsequently appear that the information which the plaintiff is entitled to receive from his agents cannot be procured in this way, and that an inspection of the books is necessary and requisite, then the plaintiff should have leave to renew his application for a production of the books. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, to abide the final event; and with leave to the plaintiff, after the examination of the defend[843]*843ant, or in connection therewith, upon proper cause shown, to apply to the court for an order directing the production of these books for inspection.

Daniels and Bartlett, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dyett v. Seymour, 2 N.Y.S. 842, 19 N.Y. St. Rep. 714, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

2 N.Y.S. 842 (Dyett v. Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.